Gianluca Cadenasso vs Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does second serve performance impact match outcomes? Wayenburg has slightly better second serve point wins at 43.6% compared to Cadenasso's 42.35%, indicating a marginal edge.
• In recent return game stats, Wayenburg outperforms by winning 48.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cadenasso wins 43.22%. This suggests Wayenburg is stronger in seizing opportunities during return games.
• However, Cadenasso boasts a better performance on first serve returns, winning 28.45% of points compared to Wayenburg's 26.57%.
• Under pressure, Wayenburg has a slight advantage with a 50.42% breakpoint save rate over Cadenasso's 48.19%, indicating resilience in critical moments.
• Who has a better recent win rate? Cadenasso’s win rate of 64.91% over the past year surpasses Wayenburg's 47.06%, highlighting a stronger overall form.
• Cadenasso excels on hard surfaces with a career win rate of 67%, slightly better than Wayenburg's best surface win rate of 61% on indoor hard surfaces.
• In terms of tournament experience, Cadenasso's win rate at Futures/Satellites tournaments is 69.39%, compared to Wayenburg's 42.86% at Challengers/ITF events.
• Wayenburg has faced tougher opponents with an average ranking of 258.1, compared to Cadenasso’s opponents averaging a rank of 409.47.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Cadenasso has a superior performance, winning 71% of such sets compared to Wayenburg’s 50%.
• Both players exhibit similar break point conversion rates, with Wayenburg at 34.19% and Cadenasso at 33.33%, indicating close competition in breaking serve opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (July 11, 2025, UTC):

Amidst closely matched statistics, key elements such as second serve performance highlight Wayenburg's minor edge. Yet, overall match success favors Cadenasso due to their superior recent form and higher winning percentage on hard courts.

Cadenasso's proficiency in first serve returns and critical deciding set victories further bolster their competitive advantage. Conversely, Wayenburg demonstrates strength against higher-ranked opponents, suggesting the capability to challenge Cadenasso.

With resilience evident in critical situations and a commendable breakpoint save rate, Wayenburg remains a formidable adversary.

Despite these qualities, Cadenasso's consistent overall performance, coupled with favorable surface conditions, positions them as the likelier winner in this upcoming match.